
All iLive content is medically reviewed or fact checked to ensure as much factual accuracy as possible.
We have strict sourcing guidelines and only link to reputable media sites, academic research institutions and, whenever possible, medically peer reviewed studies. Note that the numbers in parentheses ([1], [2], etc.) are clickable links to these studies.
If you feel that any of our content is inaccurate, out-of-date, or otherwise questionable, please select it and press Ctrl + Enter.
Too Young for Your Age: Why 'Youthful' Immunity in Old Age May Push You to Autoimmunity
Last reviewed: 18.08.2025

In the journal Nature Aging, immunologists Cornelia Weyand and Jörg Goronczy propose a paradoxical idea: the very “preservation of youthful” immunity in old age can increase the risk of autoimmune diseases. Using giant cell arteritis (GCA) as an example, the authors demonstrate the mechanism: stem-like memory T cells (T_SCM) near vascular foci supply an endless “stream” of aggressive effector T cells, while antigen-presenting cells, poor in inhibitory ligands, disrupt peripheral tolerance. Against the background of age-related growth of “neoantigens,” such “unceasing immune competence” gives autoimmunity a head start. The authors’ conclusion: in an aging organism, immune aging is partly an adaptation that protects against self-damage; attempts at “immune rejuvenation” require great caution.
Background
- Immune aging ≠ simply “fading away”. With age, the immune system loses its effectiveness (immunodeficiency) and simultaneously forms chronic low-intensity inflammation ( inflammaging ), which is associated with a worse response to vaccines and an increase in diseases, including autoimmune ones. At the same time, autoantibodies are more often detected in the elderly, which hints at a weakening of peripheral tolerance.
- Paradox: the risk of autoimmunity increases with age. Recent reviews show that changes in innate and adaptive immunity shift the balance from protection to self-destruction - "immune aging" becomes a risk factor for autoimmune diseases.
- Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an indicator of age-related autoimmunity. The disease is almost never seen before age 50, and its incidence and prevalence in 50+ is well documented: overall incidence is ~10 per 100,000 (higher in Scandinavia), peak is 70-79 years.
- Cellular signature: stem-like memory T cells (T_SCM). This is a rare pool of long-lived, self-sustaining T cells at the top of the memory hierarchy; they are capable of repeatedly replenishing effector clones. Such “immune youth” at sites of inflammation could theoretically fuel chronic autoimmunity.
- A practical lesson from oncoimmunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, by “removing the brakes” from T cells, effectively fight tumors, but often cause autoimmune side effects (irAEs) - direct evidence that “overly vigorous” immunity tends to attack its own tissues, especially in older people.
- What the new perspective in Nature Aging suggests. Weyand and Goronczy formulate the idea: the “preserved youth” of individual immune niches in the aging organism (e.g., perivascular T_SCM in GCA), combined with an increase in the antigen load of tissues and the weakness of inhibitory signals on antigen-presenting cells, creates the conditions for autoimmunity. Consequence: “immune rejuvenation” programs in the elderly should also be assessed in terms of the cost in the form of autoimmune risk.
The main paradox
With age, the "protective" immunity weakens - it fights infections and cancer worse. But the risk of many autoimmune diseases increases and even peaks in late life. Why? The authors offer an explanation: when part of the immune system "does not age properly", it remains too "combat-ready" in relation to its own tissues, especially if they give more reasons for recognition with age (mutations, protein modifications, decay "garbage").
Mechanism (using giant cell arteritis as an example)
- T_SCM near the lesion. A "survival niche" for stem-like memory CD4+ T cells is formed in the wall of the inflamed artery. They live a long time and inexhaustibly replenish the pool of attacking T cells, maintaining chronic inflammation.
- Breakdown of the tolerance brakes. Antigen-presenting cells (APC) (dendritic and others) in the foci do not express enough inhibitory ligands - that is, the "brake pedal" of the immune system is weakly pressed. Tolerance to one's own antigens falls apart.
- More targets to attack. With age, the immunogenic load of antigens increases - from mutations to post-translational changes. In total, this gives an unhindered, "teenage" in power response against one's own tissues.
The final model: delayed immune aging + increasing “background” of neoantigens + weak brakes on APC ⇒ autoimmunity in the elderly.
Why it matters (and not just about arteries)
- Anti-aging vs. autoimmunity. Today, there is a lot of discussion about “rejuvenation” of the immune system (from training and diets to experimental interventions). The authors warn that by increasing “combat readiness,” one can inadvertently increase the risk of autoimmune exacerbations in old age. A balance is needed between protection against infections/cancer and prevention of self-harm.
- Oncoimmunology gives clues. Immunotherapies that remove the immune brakes (checkpoint inhibitors) are known for their immune side effects - this is practical confirmation that "too vigorous" immunity tends to attack its own. The perspective calls for taking this lesson into account in heroic scenarios.
- Targets for therapy: Approaches that selectively “age” (calm) problematic T-cell niches or restore inhibitory APC signals may reduce the risk of autoimmunity without depriving the patient of all protection.
What does this change in approaches to “healthy immune aging”?
- Personalization instead of "the younger, the better". The "calendar" of immune aging is uneven for different people: somewhere it is useful to "spur", and somewhere - not to pump gas. T_SCM biomarkers, the profile of inhibitory ligands on APC and "neoantigen load" can help to stratify the risk.
- Complexity of care. Physical activity and control of comorbidities improve immune fitness, but immune “doping” in the elderly should also be assessed for its autoimmune cost.
Limitations and open questions
- This is conceptual work: it synthesizes data and puts forward a model, rather than proving it with a new clinical trial. Prospective studies monitoring T_SCM, APC phenotype, and autoimmune outcomes in the elderly are needed.
- It is possible that different autoimmune diseases are affected differently by “delayed immune aging”; there are no universal recipes yet.
Source: Weyand CM, Goronzy JJ “Sustained immune youth risks autoimmune disease in the aging host.” Nature Aging (Perspective), published August 14, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43587-025-00919-w